Posted by
Trey Mays on Monday, July 21, 2008 10:13:50 PM
I'll let y'all read her op-ed for yourselves, but she makes an excellent case for drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). In short, by showing that the parts of ANWR that would be explored for oil are...basically...the parts that aren't the "pristine" parts.
Where conservatives want to drill in ANWR, I think, plants can't grow, and the animals that exploration would supposedly do loads of damage to actually love the warmth of the pipeline. My question is if it's so dangerous to the animals, then why can't the animals sense that it's supposedly so dangerous?
On a finishing note, the new technological breakthroughs that we have make it so much easier to explore and drill with doing very little to no damage to God's Creation (the environment). So let's let the free market work, and say "YES!" to all energy sources with no government regulations.
Drill Here. Drill Now. Pay Less.